But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless.
Titus 3:9
As a pastor and a shepherd to a church community, there is an unhealthy pattern I see (both in the church and in the world) that has the accent of the enemy all over it. The pattern repeats itself so much that I am left to conclude that it is a tactic of the enemy to cause confusion and division. Here’s the pattern:
- A “watchdog” group uses a term that people have heard of but few people know the actual, scholarly definition of (often it’s a meaningless neologism with no specific definition).
- The purpose is to keep the term broad enough to use vague characterizations that can’t be proven in order to lump a bunch of unrelated people together under this new umbrella category.
- Then, to support the claim, “guilt by association” is leveraged to create a paranoid conspiracy theory.
- Once enough people or groups are all lumped together under this vague and poorly defined word using vague and poorly defined characterizations, and once enough fear is stoked, the hope is to create a siege mentality where people circle the wagons to protect themselves from this awful “movement” whatever it might be.
Here’s an example of how this works:
(1) Label everyone to the right of you on the political spectrum a “Christian Nationalist” who believes in “dominionism.” (2) Keep those two terms broad enough and the definitions vague enough to lump lots of people into it. (3) Once you’ve accused enough groups of falling under these categories, vehemently condemn anyone in the category for trying to take over America. (4) Encourage “everyone else” to guard themselves against this dangerous movement.
See how that works?
Here’s another way I’ve seen it play out in the church:
Imagine a church member coming up to their pastor and saying, “Pastor, there is this group out there call the New Presbyterians (NewPrez for short). I researched them online. I heard they were satan worshipers and Tim Keller was a part of them. You quoted from Tim Keller the other day in your sermon. Are you leading our church into the NewPrez movement?”
Can you see how it works?
New term (NewPrez) that is vaguely and poorly defined? Check. Vague characterizations that can’t be proven (satan worshipers)? Check. Lumping in people that are unrelated (Tim Keller)? Check. Guilt by association (using a quote)? Check. Fear? Check. The always reliable “online research”? Check. Siege mentality (we have to protect ourselves from this danger!)? Check.
And how does one answer this question?
If the pastor tells them that there are such things as Presbyterians but that this franken-monster conspiracy known as “NewPrez” isn’t a thing, then the pastor will be accused of being a card-carrying member of NewPrez evidenced by his denial.
If the pastor distances himself and says, “We don’t have anything to do with NewPrez and we don’t plan on ever joining that group,” then he is essentially affirming that this group is real and that everything you’ve heard about the group is real, and that Tim Keller must have been a satan worshiper. But if that’s true, why did you quote from him on Sunday morning?
It’s a catch-22. It’s somewhat similar to when the Pharisees asked Jesus if they should pay taxes to Caesar. If he said “Yes,” he was trapped, and if he said “No,” he was trapped. Jesus found a third way out. (Matthew 22:15-22)
People are ruining friendships, hurting families, and leaving churches over this kind of thing. This is not the work of “truth.” This is the work of the enemy. If you see this pattern, recognize it. Detect the accent of the enemy in it. Don’t be fooled by it. It’s the same tactic over and over again. The enemy isn’t creative. Instead of giving into fear and false accusations, seek the truth and find the third way as Jesus did.